Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Caroline Garcia vs Maria Kirilenko Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Garcia vs Kirilenko analysis and find out who is favored!
Caroline Garcia vs Maria Kirilenko Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Garcia 0 - 0 Kirilenko
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Garcia has won 47.65% of points on their second serve, while Kirilenko has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Garcia, in recent form, has won 50% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kirilenko has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.17% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Garcia has saved 55.37% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kirilenko has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Garcia has won 53.33% of matches played (W/L 32/ 28), with Kirilenko winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Garcia has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 65% (W/L 51/ 28), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 221/ 183). Kirilenko has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 223/ 147), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 25/ 29).
- Player level: In the last year, Garcia has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 57.69% of matches (W/L 15/ 11), where as Kirilenko has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Garcia has played against opponents with an average rank of 94.78 while Kirilenko has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Garcia has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kirilenko has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Garcia has converted 38.61% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kirilenko has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
22
Rank
4
High
30
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
10
High
37
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
57% (457-348)
Career Total W/L
58% (346-251)
54% (15-13)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$10,171,531
Career Prize Money
$3,347,967
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Caroline Garcia | Maria Kirilenko |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 54% (15/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (35/34) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (324/323) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 53% (9/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.68 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 214 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 76 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:5 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 91.46 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1225/2056) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (868/1225) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (396/831) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (78/202) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (790/2073) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (6/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 64% (7/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 54% (15/28) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 62% (8/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 76% (17/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 24% (17/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Caroline Garcia Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Sofia Kenin
Player
Caroline Garcia
81%
(
44 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
1
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Eva Lys
57%
(
62 of
108)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
18
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
8
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
42 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
107
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Danielle Rose Collins
Player
Caroline Garcia
48%
(
29 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
7
Aces
7
8
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Elisabetta Cocciaretto
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
11
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Caroline Garcia
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Xinyu Wang
45%
(
27 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
8
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sloane Stephens
Player
Caroline Garcia
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Elena Gabriela Ruse
71%
(
56 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
35%
(
28 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
52)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Anna Schmiedlova
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
100%
(
20 of
20)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
51
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caroline Garcia
Player
Elisabetta Cocciaretto
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
57 of
89)
11
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
8
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Maria Kirilenko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Tsvetana Pironkova
Player
Maria Kirilenko
44%
(
24 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Karolina Pliskova
Player
Maria Kirilenko
48%
(
52 of
108)
1st Serve %
64%
(
74 of
116)
10
Aces
1
14
Double Faults
4
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
47 of
74)
39%
(
22 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
47 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
53 of
116)
114
Total Points Won
110
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Kirilenko
Player
Kaia Kanepi
65%
(
66 of
102)
1st Serve %
39%
(
42 of
109)
4
Aces
9
7
Double Faults
21
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
45%
(
10 of
22)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
46%
(
47 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
58 of
109)
113
Total Points Won
98
|
6-7(3) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maria Kirilenko
Player
Klara Koukalova
53%
(
51 of
96)
1st Serve %
48%
(
41 of
86)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
10
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
86)
101
Total Points Won
81
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Kirilenko
Player
Donna Vekic
55%
(
53 of
97)
1st Serve %
47%
(
44 of
94)
4
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
12
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
39%
(
17 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
46%
(
45 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
47 of
94)
99
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Sharapova
Player
Maria Kirilenko
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Shuai Peng
Player
Maria Kirilenko
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve %
71%
(
32 of
45)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Kirilenko
Player
Sloane Stephens
85%
(
55 of
65)
1st Serve %
70%
(
60 of
86)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
86)
82
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mona Barthel
Player
Maria Kirilenko
43%
(
22 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
32 of
45)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johanna Larsson
Player
Maria Kirilenko
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Garcia Vs Kirilenko Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Garcia are available here and Kirilenko photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
